DeSalvo et al v. Spear et al

Filing 25

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 24 pltf's complaint is dismissed without prejudice for failure to pay the filing fee, failure to comply with Local Rule 5.5(c)(2) and for failure to respond to the Court's order; an in forma pauperis appeal taken from this order and judgment dismissing this action would be frivolous and not in good faith. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 11/10/14. (tjb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION JAMIE DESALVO et al. VS. PLAINTIFFS 4:14-CV-00361-BRW JOSEPH BROCK SPEAR, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER I have reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, I approve and adopt as my findings in all respects the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition in their entirety. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to pay the filing fee, failure to comply with Local Rule 5.5(c)(2), and for failure to respond to the Court’s order. I certify that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action would be frivolous and not in good faith. IT IS SO ORDERED this 10th day of November, 2014. /s/ Billy Roy Wilson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?