Stevens v. Doe et al
Filing
12
ORDER ADOPTING 8 Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition. Plaintiff's claims against Defendants John Does, Department of Veterans Affairs, Little Rock Police Department and Ault are DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to sta te a claim upon which relief can be granted. Plaintiff's medical treatment claim is construed as a cause of action under the FTCA. The United States of America is added as a Defendant to this action. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from any Order adopting this Partial Disposition would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 10/29/2014. (mcz)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
WESTERN DIVISION
JIMMY DON STEVENS
V.
PLAINTIFF
4:14CV00379 JM/JTR
JOHN DOES, et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Partial
Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Thomas J. Ray and
Plaintiff’s objections. After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo
review of the record, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and
Recommended Partial Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted
in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
1.
Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants John Does, Department of Veterans
Affairs, Little Rock Police Department, and Ault be DISMISSED without prejudice
for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
2.
Plaintiff’s medical treatment claim be construed as stating a cause of
action under the FTCA.
3.
The United States of America be added as a Defendant to this action.
-1-
4.
The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in
forma pauperis appeal from any Order adopting this Partial Disposition would not be
taken in good faith.
DATED this 29th day of October, 2014.
____________________________________
JAMES M. MOODY, Jr.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?