Scott v. Tally et al
Filing
20
ORDER adopting 8 Partial Recommended Disposition as this Court's findings in all respects. Scott's claims regarding the failure of the defendants to process his grievances; the defendants' interference with his access to the courts; and the defendants' failure to conduct an internal investigation are DISMISSED, without prejudice. In addition, Scott's claims against the defendants in their official capacities are DISMISSED, without prejudice; and his claims against defendants Tally, Newburn, Eckman, Jenkins, Brawley, Warner, and Best are DISMISSED, without prejudice. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 10/8/2014. (ks)
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
WESTERN DIVISION
EDDIE SCOTT, JR.
#9501-13
v.
PLAINTIFF
NO. 4:14-CV-00412 JLH/BD
TALLY, et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
The Court has received a Partial Recommended Disposition filed by Magistrate
Judge Beth Deere. The parties have not filed objections. After a careful review of the
recommendation, the Court concludes that it should be, and hereby is, approved and
adopted as this Court’s findings, in all respects.
Scott’s claims regarding the failure of the defendants to process his grievances; the
defendants’ interference with his access to the courts; and the cefendants’ failure to
conduct an internal investigation are DISMISSED, without prejudice. In addition, Scott’s
claims against the defendants in their official capacities are DISMISSED, without
prejudice; and his claims against defendants Tally, Newburn, Eckman, Jenkins, Brawley,
Warner, and Best are DISMISSED, without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 8th day of October, 2014.
________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
