McCall v. Crews et al
Filing
10
JUDGMENT: Pursuant to the 9 Order filed on this date, it is considered, ordered, and adjudged that plaintiff Jamie Shawn McCall's claims against defendants Jordan Crews, Troy Braswell, and James Cody Hiland are dismissed with prejudice and th at this case is dismissed without prejudice in all other respects. The relief sought is denied. The Court further certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the Order and Judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 10/01/2014. (rhm)
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
WESTERN DIVISION
JAMIE SHAWN MCCALL
ADC #610019
V.
PLAINTIFF
Case No: 4:14-cv-00437 KGB
JORDAN CREWS, et al.
DEFENDANTS
JUDGMENT
Pursuant to the Order filed on this date, it is considered, ordered, and adjudged that
plaintiff Jamie Shawn McCall’s claims against defendants Jordan Crews, Troy Braswell, and
James Cody Hiland are dismissed with prejudice and that this case is dismissed without prejudice
in all other respects. The relief sought is denied. The Court further certifies that an in forma
pauperis appeal taken from the Order and Judgment dismissing this action is considered
frivolous and not in good faith.
SO ADJUDGED this 1st day of October, 2014.
____________________________________
Kristine G. Baker
United States District Judge
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
