Allen v. Staley et al
ORDER ADOPTING 82 Proposed Findings and Recommendations. Plaintiff's 69 Motion for Summary Judgment and 73 Supplemental Motion for Summary Judgment are DENIED. Defendants' 75 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Plaintiffs complaint against Defendants Staley, Bufford, Dallas, and Grigsby is DISMISSED with prejudice. Plaintiff's complaint against John Does is DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 6/29/2015. (mcz)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
SHAUN C. ALLEN
JOHN STALEY, et al.
The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States
Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. After a review of those proposed findings and
recommendations, and the timely objections received thereto, as well as a de novo review of the
record, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly,
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that
Plaintiff’s Motion and Supplemental Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. Nos.
69, 73) are DENIED.
Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 75) is GRANTED.
Plaintiff’s complaint against Defendants Staley, Bufford, Dallas, and Grigsby is
DISMISSED with prejudice.
Plaintiff’s complaint against John Does is DISMISSED without prejudice.
An appropriate Judgment shall accompany this Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 29th day of June, 2015.
JAMES M. MOODY, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?