Allen v. Staley et al

Filing 86

ORDER ADOPTING 82 Proposed Findings and Recommendations. Plaintiff's 69 Motion for Summary Judgment and 73 Supplemental Motion for Summary Judgment are DENIED. Defendants' 75 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Plaintiffs complaint against Defendants Staley, Bufford, Dallas, and Grigsby is DISMISSED with prejudice. Plaintiff's complaint against John Does is DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 6/29/2015. (mcz)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
WESTERN DIVISION
SHAUN C. ALLEN
v.

PLAINTIFF
4:14CV00481-JM-JTK

JOHN STALEY, et al.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States
Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. After a review of those proposed findings and
recommendations, and the timely objections received thereto, as well as a de novo review of the
record, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly,
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that
1.

Plaintiff’s Motion and Supplemental Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. Nos.
69, 73) are DENIED.

2.

Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 75) is GRANTED.

3.

Plaintiff’s complaint against Defendants Staley, Bufford, Dallas, and Grigsby is

DISMISSED with prejudice.
4.

Plaintiff’s complaint against John Does is DISMISSED without prejudice.

An appropriate Judgment shall accompany this Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 29th day of June, 2015.

______________________________________
JAMES M. MOODY, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE