Homan v. Johnson et al

Filing 24

ORDER adopting 22 Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure comply with Local Rule 5.5(c)(2), and failure to respond to the Court's 20 order. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 7/21/2015. (ks)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
LITTLE ROCK DIVISION
JAMES HOMAN
ADC #135367
V.

PLAINTIFF

NO: 4:14CV00505 SWW

CARL JOHNSON et al

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted
by United States Magistrate Judge Jerry W. Cavaneau, and the objections filed. After carefully
considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the Court
concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are,
approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
1.

Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure comply

with Local Rule 5.5(c)(2), and failure to respond to the Court’s order.
2.

The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and

judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 21ST DAY OF JULY, 2015.
/s/Susan Webber Wright
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE