Perkins v. Jones et al

Filing 5

ORDER directing the Plaintiff to notify the Clerk of Court of her current address within 30 days of the date of this Order's entrance. Her failure to do so will result in the dismissal of her Complaint without prejudice pursuant to Local Rule 5.5(c)(2). Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 09/22/2014. (kcs)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION SHANEICE PERKINS, ADC # 754203 V. PLAINTIFF 4:14CV00507 BRW/JTR WOODY JONES, Doctor, Russellville Medical Clinic, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER Plaintiff Shaneice Perkins commenced this pro se action by filing a Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Doc. 2). On September 5, 2014 filings from the Court mailed to Plaintiff were returned as undeliverable.1 Doc. 4. Pro se litigants are required to follow the same rules of procedure, including the local court rules, that govern other litigants. Of particular note to pro se plaintiffs is Local Rule 5.5(c)(2), which states: Parties appearing pro se. It is the duty of any party not represented by counsel to promptly notify the Clerk and the other parties to the proceedings of any change in his or her address, to monitor the progress of the case, and to prosecute or defend the action diligently. A party appearing for himself/herself shall sign his/her pleadings and state his/her address, zip code, and telephone number. If any communication from the Court to a pro se plaintiff is not responded to within thirty (30) 1 A message on the return envelope indicated that Plaintiff had been paroled on June 27, 2014. Regardless, it is Plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the Clerk of Court apprised of her most current address. -1- days, the case may be dismissed without prejudice. Any party proceeding pro se shall be expected to be familiar with and follow the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Loc. R. 5.5(c)(2) (emphasis added). Accordingly, Plaintiff is ordered to notify the Clerk of Court of her current address within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order’s entrance. Her failure to do so will result in the dismissal of her Complaint without prejudice pursuant to Local Rule 5.5(c)(2). SO ORDERED THIS 22nd day of September, 2014. UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?