Duhe et al v. Little Rock Arkansas, City of et al
Filing
195
JUDGMENT pursuant to the Court's previous 189 Order, and the 194 Opinion and Order entered on this date detailing the Court's rationale, the Court denies plaintiffs Ronald Duhe, Mark Holick, and Spirit One Christian Center, Inc. 9;s 100 second motion for partial summary judgment. The Court grants defendants Sidney Allen and the City of Little Rock, Arkansas's 134 motion for summary judgment. Finally, the Court grants defendant Pulaski County's 138 motion for summary judgment. Plaintiffs' claims are hereby dismissed with prejudice. The relief requested is denied. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 4/27/2017. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
WESTERN DIVISION
RONALD DUHE, individually;
MARK HOLICK, individually; and
SPIRIT ONE CHRISTIAN CENTER, INC.,
a Kansas Non-Profit Corporation
v.
PLAINTIFFS
Case No. 4:14-cv-580-KGB
THE CITY OF LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS,
an Arkansas municipal corporation; SIDNEY
ALLEN, in an individual capacity; and PULASKI COUNTY,
an Arkansas political subdivision
DEFENDANTS
JUDGMENT
Pursuant to the Court’s previous Order (Dkt. No. 189), and the Order entered in this matter
on this date detailing the Court’s rationale, the Court denies plaintiffs Ronald Duhe, Mark Holick,
and Spirit One Christian Center, Inc.’s second motion for partial summary judgment (Dkt. No.
100). The Court grants defendants Sidney Allen and the City of Little Rock, Arkansas’s motion
for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 134). Finally, the Court grants defendant Pulaski County’s
motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 138). Plaintiffs’ claims are hereby dismissed with
prejudice. The relief requested is denied.
It is so adjudged this the 27th day of April, 2017.
_______________________________
Kristine G. Baker
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?