Arkansas Painting & Specialties Inc v. USA et al

Filing 23

AGREED ORDER. The parties have agreed to settle this action on these terms: The U.S. has conceded that $41,625.86 of Form 941 tax assessed for December 31, 2008, should be abated and that penalties should be reduced by $30,063.26, to reflec t federal tax deposits made during those periods, and that those amounts, plus interest in the amount of $11,139.57 should be refunded to Arkansas Painting & Specialties Inc. Arkansas Painting & Specialties acknowledged it has now received check s from the U.S. equal to the above total amount, $82,828.69. Arkansas Painting & Specialties has agreed to dismiss its remaining claims with prejudice. The Court approves the parties' settlement and this action will be dismissed with prejudice with each side to bear its own costs and fees. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 5/11/2016. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION ARKANSAS PAINTING & SPECIALTIES, INC. v. PLAINTIFF No. 4:14-cv-587-DPM USA and INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE DEFENDANTS AGREED ORDER The parties have agreed to settle this action on these terms: • The United States has conceded that $41,625.86 of Form 941 tax assessed for December 31, 2008, should be abated and that penalties should be reduced by $30,063.26, to reflect federal tax deposits made during those periods, and that those amounts, plus interest in the amount of $11,139.57, should be refunded to Arkansas Painting & Specialties, Inc. • Arkansas Painting & Specialties acknowledges it has now received checks from the United States equal to the above total amount, $82,828.69. • Arkansas Painting & Specialties has agreed to dismiss its remaining claims with prejudice. The Court approves the parties’ settlement. This action will be dismissed with prejudice with each side to bear its own costs and fees. So Ordered. D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge 11 May 2016 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?