Lewis v. Holladay et al
ORDER ADOPTING 38 Partial Report and Recommendations. Plaintiff's 32 Motion to Amend and for Service of Process is GRANTED. Mr. Jackman, Mr. Stuart and Ms. Elliott and DISMISSED as Defendants; Vanessa Lowe is re-instated as a defendant; K. Stone is substituted as the new "Jane Doe nurse" for Ms. Elliott; the Clerk of the Court is directed to issue and the United States Marshal is directed to serve, without prepayment of fees or costs or the giving of security a summons and copy of the 3 Amended Complaint on Vanessa Lowe and K. Stone. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 3/20/2015. (mcz)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
ARRON MICHAEL LEWIS
CHARLES “DOC” HOLLADAY, et al.
I have received findings and a recommendation from Magistrate Judge H. David Young.
No objections have been filed. After a careful, de novo review of the record, I adopt as my
findings in all respects Judge Young’s findings and recommendation in their entirety.
Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend and for Service of Process (Doc. No. 32)1 is GRANTED.
Accordingly, Mr. Jackman, Mr. Stuart, and Ms. Elliott are DISMISSED as defendants; Vanessa
Lowe2 is re-instated as a defendant; K. Stone is substituted as the new “Jane Doe nurse” for Ms.
Elliott; the Clerk of the Court is directed to issue, and the United States Marshal (“Marshal”) is
directed to serve (without the prepayment of fees or costs or the giving of security) a summons
and copy of the Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 3), on Vanessa Lowe and K. Stone at:
Pulaski County Sheriff’s Department
3201 West Roosevelt Road
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72204
IT IS SO ORDERED this 20th day of March, 2015.
/s/ Billy Roy Wilson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
The Clerk of the Court has construed the motion as a motion to dismiss, re-instate
parties, and for service.
Ms. Lowe was previously identified as “Deputy Lowe” and was dismissed on January 6,
2015. See Doc. No. 14.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?