Billings v. Johnson
Filing
131
ORDER adopting 96 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. Defendant Jane/John Doe # 1 is DISMISSED without prejudice. Plaintiff's claim for injunctive relief in his 94 Fourth Amended Complaint is DENIED. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 11/18/2015. (ks)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
WESTERN DIVISION
BRYANT ANTHONY BILLINGS,
ADC #093957
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Plaintiff,
v.
JOHNSON, Doctor,
Pulaski County Jail; et al.
Defendants.
No. 4:14CV00674-SWW-JJV
ORDER
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition
submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and Plaintiff’s Objections. After carefully
considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the
Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and
adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:
1.
Defendant Jane/John Doe # 1 is DISMISSED without prejudice.
2.
Plaintiff’s claim for injunctive relief in his Fourth Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 94)
is DENIED.
3.
The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis
appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 18th day of November, 2015.
/s/Susan Webber Wright
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?