Billings v. Johnson

Filing 131

ORDER adopting 96 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. Defendant Jane/John Doe # 1 is DISMISSED without prejudice. Plaintiff's claim for injunctive relief in his 94 Fourth Amended Complaint is DENIED. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 11/18/2015. (ks)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION BRYANT ANTHONY BILLINGS, ADC #093957 * * * * * * * * * * Plaintiff, v. JOHNSON, Doctor, Pulaski County Jail; et al. Defendants. No. 4:14CV00674-SWW-JJV ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and Plaintiff’s Objections. After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. Defendant Jane/John Doe # 1 is DISMISSED without prejudice. 2. Plaintiff’s claim for injunctive relief in his Fourth Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 94) is DENIED. 3. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. IT IS SO ORDERED this 18th day of November, 2015. /s/Susan Webber Wright UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?