Billings v. Johnson

Filing 138

ORDER the Court declines to adopt the 133 Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition; the Court finds plaintiff's objections are an untimely response to the motion for summary judgment 127 ; the Court directs the Magistrate Judge to reconsider the motion for summary judgment in light of plaintiff's objections. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 1/20/16. (tjb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION BRYANT ANTHONY BILLINGS, ADC #093957 * * * * * * * * * * Plaintiff, v. JOHNSON, Doctor, Pulaski County Jail; et al. Defendants. No. 4:14CV00674-SWW ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and plaintiff’s objections. After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record, the Court declines to adopt the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition. The Court finds plaintiff’s objections are in effect an untimely response to the motion to summary judgment to dismiss his claims based on failure to exhaust. The Court directs the Magistrate Judge to reconsider the motion for summary judgment in light of plaintiff’s objections. DATED this 20th day of January, 2016. /s/Susan Webber Wright UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?