Barnett v. Holiday et al
Filing
126
ORDER adopting 121 the recommended disposition; denying as moot 76 88 Barnett's Motions for Summary Judgment; and granting 98 defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 2/17/2016. (kdr)
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
WESTERN DIVISION
MATTHEW W. BARNETT,
ADC #135607
v.
PLAINTIFF
CASE NO. 4:14CV00699 BSM
DOC HOLLADAY, et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
The recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Beth
Deere and the plaintiff’s objections thereto have been reviewed. After carefully considering
these documents and making a de novo review of the record, the recommended disposition
is hereby adopted in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
1. The defendants’ motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 98] is granted. Barnett’s
First Amendment claim is dismissed with prejudice. His deliberate indifference claims are
dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust his administrative remedies.
2. Barnett’s motions for summary judgment [Doc. Nos. 76, 88] are denied as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 17th day of February 2016.
________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
