Clark et al v. Vailes et al
Filing
10
ORDER adopting 4 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. Plaintiff's 2 Complaint against Defendants is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief ma y be granted. This dismissal is considered a strike within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 2/6/2015. (ks)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
WESTERN DIVISION
SEYOUM ALI CLARK,
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Plaintiff,
v.
CHIOMA HAWKINS, Supervising Parole
Officer (DCC); et al.
Defendants.
No. 4:15-cv-00010-SWW-JJV
ORDER
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted
by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe. After carefully considering the objections and
making a de novo review of pertinent portions of the record, the Court concludes that the Proposed
Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their
entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:
1.
Plaintiff’s Complaint against Defendants is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure
to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.
2
This dismissal is considered a “strike” within the meaning of the Prison Litigation
Reform Act (PLRA), 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
3.
The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis
appeal from this Order and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 6th day of February, 2015.
/s/Susan Webber Wright
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?