Hudson Enterprises Inc et al v. Risk Placement Services Inc et al
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 7 and 15 Motions to Dismiss. All of Ray and Debra Hudson's claims are dismissed without prejudice, and they're dismissed as parties, for lack of standing, which undermines subject matter jurisd iction. For various reasons, all of Hudson Enterprises's claims against Certain Underwriters - except its breach-of-contract claims - are dismissed with prejudice. All of Hudson Enterprises's claims against Risk Placement - except the unjus t enrichment claim - are dismissed with prejudice. The unjust enrichment claims is dismissed without prejudice. Hudson Enterprises's embedded motion to amend for a third time, 17 , is denied. With one exception, any amendment would be futile. The exception is the potential unjust enrichment claim against Risk Placement, which can be addressed in due course. Case stayed. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 5/29/2015. (jak)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?