Hudson Enterprises Inc et al v. Risk Placement Services Inc et al
Filing
44
ORDER denying 38 Motion for Sanctions; denying 39 Motion to Strike. The Court amends the Final Scheduling Order and sets the following deadlines: 26 February 2016 - Underwriters must provide any other non-privileged Gray material about the insurance claim, including internal email. 29 February 2016 - Hudson must allow Underwriters to inspect the marina. 4 March 2016 - Hudson must decide if it will hire an expert, and notify Underwriters. 31 March 2016 - Hudson must provide any expert report. If Hudson hires an expert, Underwriters may depose that person outside the discovery period. The Final Scheduling Order, 26 , otherwise remains in effect. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 2/22/2016. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
WESTERN DIVISION
HUDSON ENTERPRISES, INC.,
d/b/a River Valley Marina
v.
PLAINTIFF
No. 4:15-cv-12-DPM
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S
LONDON INSURANCE COMPANIES,
Subscribing to Policy #10NCG01559 and
Agreement Numbers NPPI1011456 and
NPPI09112456
DEFENDANT
ORDER
For the reasons stated on the record at the 19 February motions hearing,
the Court denies the motion for sanctions, Ng 38, and the motion to strike
expert witnesses, Ng 39. The joint report, Ng 37, was addressed too.
The Court amends the Final Scheduling Order and sets the following
deadlines:
•
By 26 February 2016
Underwriters must provide any other
non-privileged Gray material about the
insurance claim, including internal email.
•
By 29 February 2016
Hudson must allow Underwriters to
inspect the marina.
•
By 4 March 2016
Hudson must decide if it will hire an
expert, and notify Underwriters.
•
By 31 March 2016
Hudson must provide any expert report.
If Hudson hires an expert, Underwriters may depose that person outside the
discovery period. The Final Scheduling Order, Ng 26, otherwise remains in
effect.
So Ordered.
D.P. Marshall Jr.
United States District Judge
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?