Henry v. Holiday et al

Filing 44

ORDER adopting the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris 42 ; defendant Carl L. Johnson's motion for summary judgment and his motion to adopt are granted 31 36 ; plaintiff's claims against Johnson are dismissed without prejudice; defendant Charles Holladay's motion for summary judgment 33 is granted and plaintiff's claims against Holladay are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 4/12/16. (tjb)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
LITTLE ROCK DIVISION
ROY HENRY, JR.
V.

PLAINTIFF
NO: 4:15CV00140 SWW/PSH

CHARLES HOLLADAY et al

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition
submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris, and the objections filed.1 After
carefully considering the objections2 and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the
Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition should be, and
hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
1.

Defendant Carl L. Johnson’s motion for summary judgment and his motion to adopt

(Doc. Nos. 31 & 36) are GRANTED, and plaintiff’s claims against Johnson are DISMISSED
WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
2.

Defendant Charles Holladay’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 33) is

GRANTED, and plaintiff’s claims against Holladay are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
DATED this 12th day of April, 2016.
/s/Susan Webber Wright
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1

Plaintiff filed a pleading entitled “Motion for Reconsideration,” docket no. 43, which the Court
interprets as plaintiff’s objections to the proposed findings and recommended disposition.
2

Plaintiff appears to raise for the first time in this action a claim that he was denied his right to
practice his religion.