Durkin et al v. Shock et al

Filing 10

ORDER of DISMISSAL. As of the entry date of this order, Plaintiffs have neither complied with nor responded to the Court's order entered 3/31/2016. It is therefore ordered that this case is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 10/14/2016. (mef)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
WESTERN DIVISION
JAMES K. DURKIN and ERIKA L.
DURKIN
Plaintiffs
V.
ANDY SHOCK, in his official capacity;
ET AL.
Defendants

*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*

NO: 4:15CV00165 SWW

ORDER of DISMISSAL
On March 20, 2015, Plaintiffs James K. Durkin and Erika L. Durkin, proceeding pro se,
commenced this lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, against Faulkner County, Arkansas. By order
entered March 31, 2016, the Court noted that Defendants had not made an appearance and that
the record did not reflect that Plaintiffs had served Defendants with a summons and complaint
within the time limit set forth under Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The
Court ordered that Plaintiffs had fourteen days to either serve Defendants or show good cause for
failure to effect timely service. As of the entry date of this order, Plaintiffs have neither
complied with nor responded to the Court’s order entered March 31, 2016.
IT IS THEREFORE ordered that this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 14th DAY OF OCTOBER, 2016.

/s/Susan Webber Wright
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE