Byrd v. Saline County Detention Facility et al

Filing 7

ORDER ADOPTING 5 Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition. Plaintiff's 2 Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Dismissal of this action counts as a "strike" for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 4/28/2015. (mcz)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION DALE EDWARD BYRD, ADC # 136124 v. PLAINTIFF 4:15CV00195-JM-JJV SALINE COUNTY DETENTION FACILITY; et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe. After carefully considering the Plaintiff’s amended complaint and making a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. ‘To prove actual injury, [a prisoner] must ‘demonstrate that a nonfrivolous legal claim had been frustrated or was being impeded.’” White v. Kautzky, 494 F.3d 677, 680 (8th Cir.2007) (quoting Lewis v. Casey, 518 U.S. 343, 353, 116 S.Ct. 2174, 135 L.Ed.2d 606 (1996)). Plaintiff claims that he was convicted of charges listed in his parole violation report because he had no law library access. (ECF No. 6). This allegation is speculative at best. Plaintiff does not demonstrate that he had a nonfrivolous legal claim to present. Therefore, the Court finds that Plaintiff’s attempt to amend his complaint is futile. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff’s Complaint (Doc. No. 2) is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 2. Dismissal of this action counts as a “strike” for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 1 3. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. DATED this 28th day of April, 2015. _______________________________________ JAMES M. MOODY, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?