Henry et al v. Randell et al

Filing 46

ORDER adopting 43 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to comply with Local Rule 5.5(c)(2), and failure to respond to the Court's 42 order. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 8/13/2015. (ks)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
WESTERN DIVISION
ROBERT E. HENRY et al.
v.

PLAINTIFFS
NO: 4:15CV00230 JLH

JOHN RANDELL et al.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by
United States Magistrate Judge Jerry W. Cavaneau. No objections have been filed. After careful
consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should
be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
1.

Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to comply

with Local Rule 5.5(c)(2), and failure to respond to the Court’s order.
2.

The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and

judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith.
DATED this 13th day of August, 2015.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE