Stivers et al v. Wright et al

Filing 19

ORDER adopting 18 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety. Plaintiff's 2 Complaint against Defendants is DISMISSED, for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. This dismissal constitutes a strike within the meaning of the PLRA. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and accompanying Judgment would not be in good faith. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 10/19/2015. (ks)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
WESTERN DIVISION
MICHAEL STIVERS,
ADC #600740
v.

PLAINTIFF
4:15CV00331-SWW-JTK

RODNEY WRIGHT, et al.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States
Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. There have been no objections. After a review of those
proposed findings and recommendations, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly,
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:
1.

Plaintiff’s Complaint against Defendants is DISMISSED, for failure to state a claim

upon which relief may be granted.
2.

This dismissal constitutes a “strike” within the meaning of the PLRA.

3.

The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and

accompanying Judgment would not be in good faith, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).
An appropriate Judgment shall accompany this Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 19th day of October, 2015.

/s/Susan Webber Wright
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1