Waters v. Faulkner County Sheriff's Office

Filing 5

ORDER adopting 4 the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition; and dismissing, without prejudice, Plaintiff's Complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. This dismissal counts as a strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). An in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 7/24/2015. (kdr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION DAVID WATERS VS. PLAINTIFF 4:15-CV-00401-BRW-JJV FAULKNER COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE DEFENDANT ORDER I have reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe Volpe (Doc. No. 4). No objections have been filed and the time for doing so has passed. After careful consideration, I approve and adopt as my findings in all respects the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition in its entirety. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Complaint (Doc. No. 2) is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.1 This dismissal counts as a “strike” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). I certify that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith.2 IT IS SO ORDERED this 24th day of July, 2015. /s/Billy Roy Wilson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 Ketchum v. City of West Memphis, Ark., 974 F.2d 81, 82 (8th Cir. 1992) (holding that department of local governments are not amenable to suit under Section 1983). 2 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?