Siddig v. Neald et al

Filing 6

ORDER adopting 4 proposed findings and recommendations in their entirety. Plaintiff's complaint against Defendants is dismissed without prejudice, for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. This dismissal constitutes a &qu ot;strike" within the meaning of the PLRA. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from an Order and Judgment dismissing this action would not be in good faith. An appropriate Judgment shall accompany this Order. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 8/21/2015. (jak)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
WESTERN DIVISION
MOHAMMED SIDDIG
v.

PLAINTIFF
No. 4:15CV00464-JLH-JTK

DEPUTY NEALD, et al.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States
Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. After a review of those proposed findings and
recommendations, and the timely objections received thereto, as well as a de novo review of the
record, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly,
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:
1.

Plaintiff’s Complaint against Defendants is DISMISSED without prejudice, for

failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.
2.

This dismissal constitutes a “strike” within the meaning of the PLRA.

3.

The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from an Order and Judgment

dismissing this action would not be in good faith, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).
An appropriate Judgment shall accompany this Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 21st day of August, 2015.

________________________________
J. LEON HOLMES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE