Siddig v. Neald et al

Filing 6

ORDER adopting 4 proposed findings and recommendations in their entirety. Plaintiff's complaint against Defendants is dismissed without prejudice, for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. This dismissal constitutes a &qu ot;strike" within the meaning of the PLRA. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from an Order and Judgment dismissing this action would not be in good faith. An appropriate Judgment shall accompany this Order. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 8/21/2015. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION MOHAMMED SIDDIG v. PLAINTIFF No. 4:15CV00464-JLH-JTK DEPUTY NEALD, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. After a review of those proposed findings and recommendations, and the timely objections received thereto, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff’s Complaint against Defendants is DISMISSED without prejudice, for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 2. This dismissal constitutes a “strike” within the meaning of the PLRA. 3. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from an Order and Judgment dismissing this action would not be in good faith, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). An appropriate Judgment shall accompany this Order. IT IS SO ORDERED this 21st day of August, 2015. ________________________________ J. LEON HOLMES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?