Siddig v. Neald et al

Filing 7

JUDGMENT pursuant to 6 Order, it is considered, ordered, and adjudged that this case be, and it is hereby, dismissed without prejudice, for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The relief sought is denied. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Judgment and accompanying Order dismissing this action would not be in good faith. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 8/21/2015. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION MOHAMMED SIDDIG v. PLAINTIFF No. 4:15CV00464-JLH-JTK DEPUTY NEALD, et al. DEFENDANTS JUDGMENT Pursuant to the order entered in this matter on this date, it is Considered, Ordered and Adjudged that this case be, and it is hereby, DISMISSED without prejudice, for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The relief sought is denied. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Judgment and accompanying Order dismissing this action would not be in good faith, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(a)(3). IT IS SO ORDERED this 21st day of August, 2015. ________________________________ J. LEON HOLMES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?