Downing v. Department of Finance and Administration et al

Filing 101

ORDER: The Court much appreciates the parties' endorsement of the definitions/questions procedure, as well as their comments, objections, and suggestions on the particulars. Attachment one is a responding redline showing the changes the Court is inclined to make and Attachment two is a clean version. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 3/28/2018. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION PLAINTIFF WILLIAM R. DOWNING, JR. v. No. 4:15-cv-570-DPM DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION, an Agency of the State of Arkansas; BOB HAUGEN and DAVID JUSTICE, Both in their Individual and Official Capacities DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court much appreciates the parties' endorsement of the definitions/ questions procedure, as well as their comments, objections, and suggestions on the particulars. Attachment one is a responding redline showing the changes the Court is inclined to make. Attachment two is a clean version. We'll talk further on these points this afternoon at the pretrial. So Ordered. D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge J.8 M~ .lOIB Attachment One • Essential job functions are the fundamental duties of Downing' s job. Marginal functions are not essential functions of the job. • Equivalent means virtually identical in terms of pay, benefits, and working conditions, including privileges, perquisites, and status. It must involve the same or substantially similar duties, skill, effort, responsibility, and authority. • An actual disability is a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities. - Substantially limits is a broad term. An impairment can be substantially limiting even though it doesn't prevent Downing from performing a major life activity. Impairments or effects of impairments that last (or are expected to last) less than six months may be substantially limiting. In deciding whether an impairment substantially limits a major life activity, you should compare Downing' s ability to perform the major life activity with an average person's ability. - Major life activities include (but aren't limited to) performing manual tasks, walking, standing, lifting, bending, and working. • Downing was regarded as having a disability if he had an actual or perceived physical impairment, regardless of whether the impairment limits or is perceived to limit a major life activity. - Downing cannot be regarded as having a disability if his impairment was transitory and minor. - A transitory impairment is one with an actual or expected duration of six months or less. (This is unlike an actual disability, which doesn't have a time limit.) -2- • Downing's disability (whether actual or perceived) was a motivating factor if that disability played a part in the Department's decision to fire Downing. • An accommodation is a modification to the work place that allows a person with a disability to perform the essential functions of the job or allows the person to enjoy the same benefits and privileges as an employee without a disability. • A reasonable accommodation is one that could reasonably be made under the circumstances and may include (but is not limited to): job restructuring; part-time or modified work schedules; reassignment to a vacant position; acquisition or modifications of equipment or devices; and other similar accommodations. Reasonable accommodation does not include creating a new position or bumping another employee in order to reassign a disabled employee. -3- Reasonable accommodation also does not necessarily mean the accommodation requested or preferred by Downing. • Undue hardship means significant difficulty or expense to the Department. Some things to consider are: - The nature and cost of the accommodation; - The number, type, and location of the Department's various facilities; - The financial resources of the Department's facility that would be involved in providing the accommodation; the number of employees at that facility; and the overall impact of the accommodation on that facility; - The financial resources and size of the Department itself; - The type of work the Department performs, including the structure and functions of the Department's workforce. -4- LIABILITY QUESTIONS 1. VVhat \¥ere the essential functions of Dov1ning' s job at the Department before he took leave? ___________ 2. 1Nas it essential pre leave that Do\vning lift fifty pounds or 2 more. Yes - No - - 3. 11!\/hat v1ere the essential functions of Dov1ning' s job at the Department after he returned from leave? _ _ _ _ _ _ __ 4. VVas it essential post leave that Dov.rning lift fifty pounds or 2 more. Yes - - No - - 5. Based on your ansv.rers to Questions 1 through 4, compare the essential functions of DoTNning' s job before and after he took leave. Consider v,rhether the pre leave and post leave jobs \¥ere substantially similar in skill, effort, responsibility, and authority. P.i:re there any material differences, or \¥ere the jobs substantially the same? -5- If you answered "no," would the Department have made the same changes to Downing's pre-leave job even if Downing had not taken FMLA leave? No - Yes - &.. 2. When Downing returned from leave, was he able to perform the essential functions of his pre-leave job? No - Yes 7. 3. Did Downing have an actual disability? No - Yes If you answered "yes/' did the Department know about Downing' s disability? No - Yes 8. 4. Whether Downing was actually disabled or not, did Bob Haugen or David Justice regard Downing as having a disability? Yes - No - 9. 5. At the time Downing was fired, did his hip-related restrictions prevent him from being able to perform any essential job functions? No - Yes 1{). 6. Was Downing fired solely because of an actual or perceived disability? Yes No - - If you answered "yes" to Question 1-0 6, skip Question l-1 7. -6- 11. 7. Was Downing's actual or perceived disability a motivating factor in the Department's decision to fire Downing? Yes - - No - - /1 If you answered yes," would the Department have fired Downing even if it had not considered his disability? No - Yes Answer the remaining Questions 12, 13, 14, 15, & 16 only if you found (see Question ~ 3) that Downing was actually disabled and that the Department knew it. 12. 8. After returning from leave, did Downing seek an accommodation for any disability? No - Yes l l 9. At the time Downing was fired, could he have performed the essential functions of his job with a reasonable accommodation? No - Yes - /1 If you answered yes," would providing the accommodation have created an undue hardship on the Department? No - Yes - - 14. Did the Department make a good faith effort to accommodate Do\vning after he returned from leave? Yes No - -7- 15. A:fter Dovv=ning returned from leave, v1as a ·v1ork schedule other than the nevi schedule possible \Vithout creating an undue hardship on the Department? No - Yes 16. 10. If you conclude that Downing requested an accommodation (see Question 12 8), was he fired solely because he sought that accommodation? Yes No Inapplicable __ -8- Attachment Two • Essential job functions are the fundamental duties of Downing' s job. Marginal functions are not essential functions of the job. • Equivalent means virtually identical in terms of pay, benefits, and working conditions, including privileges, perquisites, and status. It must involve the same or substantially similar duties, skill, effort, responsibility, and authority. • An actual disability is a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities. - Substantially limits is a broad term. An impairment can be substantially limiting even though it doesn't prevent Downing from performing a major life activity. Impairments or effects of impairments that last (or are expected to last) less than six months may be substantially limiting. In deciding whether an impairment substantially limits a major life activity, you should compare Downing' s ability to perform the major life activity with an average person's ability. - Major life activities include (but aren't limited to) performing manual tasks, walking, standing, lifting, bending, and working. • Downing was regarded as having a disability if he had an actual or perceived physical impairment, regardless of whether the impairment limits or is perceived to limit a major life activity. - Downing cannot be regarded as having a disability if his impairment was transitory and minor. - A transitory impairment is one with an actual or expected duration of six months or less. (This is unlike an actual disability, which doesn't have a time limit.) -2- • Downing' s disability (whether actual or perceived) was a motivating factor if that disability played a part in the Department's decision to fire Downing. • An accommodation is a modification to the work place that allows a person with a disability to perform the essential functions of the job or allows the person to enjoy the same benefits and privileges as an employee without a disability. • A reasonable accommodation is one that could reasonably be made under the circumstances and may include (but is not limited to): job restructuring; part-time or modified work schedules; reassignment to a vacant position; acquisition or modifications of equipment or devices; accommodations. and other similar Reasonable accommodation does not include creating a new position or bumping another employee in order to reassign a disabled employee. -3- Reasonable accommodation also does not necessarily mean the accommodation requested or preferred by Downing. • Undue hardship means significant difficulty or expense to the Department. Some things to consider are: - The nature and cost of the accommodation; - The number, type, and location of the Department's various facilities; - The financial resources of the Department's facility that would be involved in providing the accommodation; the number of employees at that facility; and the overall impact of the accommodation on that facility; - The financial resources and size of the Department itself; - The type of work the Department performs, including the structure and functions of the Department's workforce. -4- LIABILITY QUESTIONS 1. Were Downing's pre-leave and post-leave jobs equivalent? Yes No - If you answered "no," would the Department have made the same changes to Downing's pre-leave job even if Downing had not taken FMLA leave? Yes - No - - 2. When Downing returned from leave, was he able to perform the essential functions of his pre-leave job? Yes No - - 3. Did Downing have an actual disability? Yes No - If you answered "yes," did the Department know about Downing' s disability? Yes No - - 4. Whether Downing was actually disabled or not, did Bob Haugen or David Justice regard Downing as having a disability? Yes - - 5. No - - At the time Downing was fired, did his hip-related restrictions prevent him from being able to perform any essential job functions? Yes No - - -5- 6. Was Downing fired solely because of an actual or perceived disability? Yes - No - If you answered "yes" to Question 6, skip Question 7. 7. Was Downing's actual or perceived disability a motivating factor in the Department's decision to fire Downing? Yes No - /1 If you answered yes," would the Department have fired Downing even if it had not considered his disability? No - Yes Answer the remaining Questions only if you found (see Question 3) that Downing was actually disabled and that the Department knew it. 8. After returning from leave, did Downing seek an accommodation for any disability? Yes No - - 9. At the time Downing was fired, could he have performed the essential functions of his job with a reasonable accommodation? Yes - No - - If you answered yes," would providing the accommodation have created an undue hardship on the Department? No - Yes - /1 -6- 10. If you conclude that Downing requested an accommodation (see Question 8), was he fired solely because he sought that accommodation? No Inapplicable __ Yes -7-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?