Doe et al v. Arkansas Department of Education et al
Filing
123
ORDER: Joint report of discovery dispute 121 noted and overruled without prejudice. Joint motion 122 granted with caveats. First, no further discovery extensions will be granted. Second, the Court will issue a Third Amended Final Scheduling Order with the proposed deadlines; but it will also contain a compressed briefing schedule for any dispositive motion. And that schedule will not be extended. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 4/13/2017. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
WESTERN DIVISION
LAKESHA DOE, Parent, et al.
v.
PLAINTIFFS
No. 4:15-cv-623-DPM
JOHNNY KEY, In His Official Capacity
as Commissioner of Education and the
LRSD School Board, and MICHAEL
POORE, In His Official Capacity as
Superintendent of the Little Rock
School District
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
1. Joint report of discovery dispute, Ng 121, noted and overruled
without prejudice. First, Defendants have committed to another production
today. Second, Plaintiffs have not followed the Court's Scheduling Order:
this kind of dispute must be brought to the Court by both sides in one truly
joint report. Ng 111at2-3. The required procedure eliminates the back and
forth, giving the Court both sides of the dispute in one paper.
2.
Joint motion, Ng 122, granted with caveats.
First, no further
discovery extensions will be granted. Second, the Court will issue a Third
Amended Final Scheduling Order with the proposed deadlines; but it will
also contain a compressed briefing schedule for any dispositive motion. And
that schedule will not be extended.
So Ordered.
D.P. Marshall Jr.
United States District Judge
13
-2-
lfril J..017
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?