Larry et al v. Isle of Capri Casinos Inc
Filing
26
AMENDED ORDER adopting the 24 joint stipulation; dismissing the action without prejudice; and denying as moot 17 defendant IOC-Lula Inc.'s motion in limine. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 6/1/2017. (mef)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
WESTERN DIVISION
CAROLYN LARRY and
DENNIS LARRY
v.
PLAINTIFFS
Case No. 4:16-cv-00097-KGB
IOC-LULA, INC.
DEFENDANT
AMENDED ORDER
Before the Court is the parties’ joint stipulation for dismissal without prejudice pursuant to
Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Dkt. No. 24). The parties jointly request that this
Court dismiss without prejudice plaintiffs Carolyn Larry and Dennis Larry’s complaint. The
stipulation provides that “[i]f plaintiffs refile this lawsuit, it shall be refiled in this Court” at no
cost or expense to the plaintiffs (Id., ¶¶ 1, 2). Alternatively, the stipulation provides that if the
Larrys should refile the action in a different court, then “defendant shall be entitled to recover costs
and expenses occasioned by the refiling in a different court” (Id. ¶ 2). In the event of such a
refiling, “the costs and expenses shall be treated as a cost imposed upon refiling” (Id.).
For good cause shown, the Court adopts the joint stipulation (Dkt. No. 24). The action is
dismissed without prejudice. The Court denies as moot defendant IOC-Lula Inc.’s pending motion
in limine (Dkt. No. 17).
It is so ordered this the 1st day of June, 2017.
__________________________
Kristine G. Baker
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?