Rash et al v. Methodist Family Health Foundation Inc

Filing 22

ORDER: Joint 20 Motion noted. The settlement agreement will be part of the public record if the Court approves it. The parties may file their proposed agreement under if seal if they want to; but if it's approved as fair, reasonable, and adequate, the Court will unseal it. Proposed agreement due by 11/8/2016 unless this Order means there's no settlement. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 11/1/2016. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION DONALD K. RASH and NATALIYA RASH v. PLAINTIFFS No. 4:16-cv-124-DPM METHODIST FAMILY HEAL TH, INC. DEFENDANT ORDER Joint motion, NQ 20, noted. The Court is not persuaded by Schneider v. Habitat for Humanity International, Inc., No. 5:14-cv-5230, NQ 25 (W.D. Ark. 5 Feb. 2015) and the like cases cited. The settlement agreement will be part of the public record if the Court approves it. Arkansas Best Corp. v. General Electric Capital Corp., 317 Ark. 238, 247, 878 S.W.2d 708, 712 (1994); Delock v. Securitas Security Services USA, Inc., No. 4:11-cv-520-DPM, NQ 70 (E.D. Ark. 16 Nov. 2012). The parties may file their proposed agreement under seal if they want to; but if it's approved as fair, reasonable, and adequate, the Court will unseal it. Proposed agreement due by 8 November 2016 unless this Order means there's no settlement. So Ordered. v D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?