Range v. Holladay et al
ORDER adopting the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe 7 ; plaintiff's amended complaint 4 is dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; dismissal of this action counts as a "strike"; the Court certifies an in forma pauperis appeal form this order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 4/6/16. (tjb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
TAI RANGE, ADC # 153726
DOC HOLLADAY, Sheriff,
Pulaski County Sheriff’s Office; et al.
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by
United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe. No objections have been filed. After careful
consideration, I approve and adopt the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition in all
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 4) is DISMISSED without prejudice
for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Dismissal of this action counts as a
“strike” for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
I certify, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this
Order would not be taken in good faith.
IT SO ORDERED this 6th day of April, 2016.
/s/ Billy Roy Wilson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?