Range v. Holladay et al

Filing 8

ORDER adopting the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe 7 ; plaintiff's amended complaint 4 is dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; dismissal of this action counts as a "strike"; the Court certifies an in forma pauperis appeal form this order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 4/6/16. (tjb)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
WESTERN DIVISION
TAI RANGE, ADC # 153726
VS.

PLAINTIFF
4:16CV00126-BRW-JJV

DOC HOLLADAY, Sheriff,
Pulaski County Sheriff’s Office; et al.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by
United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe. No objections have been filed. After careful
consideration, I approve and adopt the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition in all
respects.
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 4) is DISMISSED without prejudice
for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Dismissal of this action counts as a
“strike” for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
I certify, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this
Order would not be taken in good faith.
IT SO ORDERED this 6th day of April, 2016.

/s/ Billy Roy Wilson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1