Wofford v. Holladay et al
Filing
14
ORDER adopting the partial recommended disposition of United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe 8 ; plaintiff's claims against defendants Doc Holladay, Pulaski County Regional Detention Facility, Bennett, Allen, Trammel and Brawley are dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted; the Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 4/21/16. (tjb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
RICKY WOFFORD, JR.
ADC # 102909
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Plaintiff,
v.
DOC HOLLADAY, Sheriff,
Pulaski County; et al.
Defendants.
No. 4:16CV00143-SWW-JJV
ORDER
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition
submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and Plaintiff’s Objections. After
carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes
that the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are,
approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:
1.
Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants Doc Holladay, Pulaski County Regional
Detention Facility, Bennett, Allen, Trammell, and Brawley are DISMISSED without prejudice for
failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted.
2.
The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis
appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 21st day of April, 2016.
/s/Susan Webber Wright
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?