Wofford v. Holladay et al

Filing 19

ORDER that Plaintiff should provide a viable address at which service for Defendant J. Smith may be attempted within 15 days of this order's entry. If he fails to do so, the Court will recommend Defendant Smith's dismissal without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 5/3/2016. (lej)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION RICKY WOFFORD, JR. ADC #102909 v. PLAINTIFF 4:16CV00143-SWW-JJV DOC HOLLADAY, Sheriff, Pulaski County; et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER On April 4, 2016, I ordered service for, among others, Defendant J. Smith. (Doc. No. 7.) Summons for this Defendant was returned unexecuted because no nurse by the name of J. Smith is employed at the Pulaski County Detention Facility. (Doc. No. 13.) Now, if Plaintiff’s claims against this Defendant are to proceed, he must provide a viable address for J. Smith within fifteen days of this Order’s entry. See Lee v. Armontrout, 991 F.2d 487, 489 (8th Cir. 1993) (per curiam) (holding that it is a pro se plaintiff’s responsibility to provide proper addresses for defendants). IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Plaintiff should provide a viable address at which service for Defendant J. Smith may be attempted within fifteen days of this Order’s entry. If he fails to do so, the Court will recommend Defendant Smith’s dismissal without prejudice. DATED this 3rd day of May, 2016. JOE J. VOLPE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?