Wofford v. Holladay et al
Filing
60
JUDGMENT: Consistent with the Order that was entered on this day, it is considered, ordered, and adjudged that this case is dismissed with prejudice. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), than an in forma pauperis appeal form this Judgment and the corresponding Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 2/17/2017. (mef)
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
WESTERN DIVISION
RICKY WOFFORD, JR.
ADC # 102909
Plaintiff,
v.
DOC HOLLADAY, Sheriff,
Pulaski County; et al.
Defendants.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
No. 4:16CV00143-SWW
JUDGMENT
Consistent with the Order that was entered on this day, it is CONSIDERED, ORDERED, and
ADJUDGED that this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28
U.S.C. ยง 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Judgment and the corresponding
Order would not be taken in good faith.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 17th day of February, 2017.
/s/Susan Webber Wright
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
