Hunt v. Randall et al

Filing 7

ORDER adopting 4 the Recommended Disposition; dismissing with prejudice Mr. Hunt's claims; ordering that this dismissal constitutes a "strike;" certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal of this dismissal would not be in good faith; and denying as moot 6 Mr. Hunt's motion for ruling. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 11/29/2016. (kdr)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
WESTERN DIVISION
STANLEY HUNT,
ADC #156426
v.

PLAINTIFF
Case No. 4:16-cv-175 KGB/BD

JOHN RANDALL, et al.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

The Court has received a Recommended Disposition (“Recommendation”) filed by
Magistrate Judge Beth Deere (Dkt. No. 4).

After careful review of the Recommendation,

plaintiff Stanley Hunt’s timely objections (Dkt. No. 5), as well as a de novo review of the record,
the Court concludes that the Recommendation should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted as
this Court’s findings in all respects.
It is therefore ordered that:
1.

Mr. Hunt’s claims are dismissed with prejudice.

2.

This dismissal constitutes a “strike” within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

3.

The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal of this dismissal would not be

in good faith.
4.

Mr. Hunt’s motion for ruling is denied as moot (Dkt. No. 6).

So ordered this 29th day of November, 2016.
_______________________________
Kristine G. Baker
United States District Judge