Peel v. Jackson County Sheriff Department et al
ORDER Adopting 79 Proposed Findings and Recommendations that the Clerk amend the docket to reflect Defendant Melanie Jones-Foster's full name; that Defendant Jones's 71 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted and Plaintiff's c laims against Defendant Jones are dismissed with prejudice; and that Defendant Jones' 77 Motion to Dismiss is also granted. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 8/21/2017. (mcz)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
JACKSON COUNTY SHERIFF
DEPARTMENT; et al.
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition
submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe.
No objections have been filed.
careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended
Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's
findings in all respects.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:
The Clerk amend the docket to reflect Defendant Melanie Jones-Foster’s full name.
(Doc. No. 34 at 1.)
Defendant Jones’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 71) is GRANTED.
Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant Jones are DISMISSED with prejudice.
Defendant Jones’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 77) also is GRANTED.
The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis
appeal from this Order adopting the recommendations would not be taken in good faith.
DATED this 21st day of August, 2017.
JAMES M. MOODY, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?