Williams v. Gillom et al

Filing 8

ORDER adopting the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris; plaintiff's complaint is dismissed without prejudice; plaintiff must submit the filing and administrative fees of &# 036;400.00 to the Clerk of the Court, noting the case number within 30 days of the date of this order, along with a motion to reopen the case; upon receipt of the motion and full payment, this case will be reopened; an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith 2 . Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 6/2/16. (tjb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION BOBBY WILLIAMS, ADC #142732 VS. PLAINTIFF 4:16CV00235 BRW N. GILLOM et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris, and the objections filed. After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the Court approves and adopts the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition in all respects. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. In his objections, Plaintiff asserts that he has the money to pay the filing fee and is willing to do so. He must submit the filing and administrative fees of $400.00 to the Clerk of the Court, noting the above case style number, within thirty days of the date of this order, along with a motion to reopen the case. Upon receipt of the motion and full payment, this case will be reopened. An in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. IT IS SO ORDERED this 2nd day of June, 2016. /s/ Billy Roy Wilson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?