Williams v. Gillom et al
Filing
8
ORDER adopting the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris; plaintiff's complaint is dismissed without prejudice; plaintiff must submit the filing and administrative fees of 036;400.00 to the Clerk of the Court, noting the case number within 30 days of the date of this order, along with a motion to reopen the case; upon receipt of the motion and full payment, this case will be reopened; an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith 2 . Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 6/2/16. (tjb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
WESTERN DIVISION
BOBBY WILLIAMS, ADC #142732
VS.
PLAINTIFF
4:16CV00235 BRW
N. GILLOM et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted
by United States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris, and the objections filed. After carefully
considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the Court
approves and adopts the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition in all respects.
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. In his objections,
Plaintiff asserts that he has the money to pay the filing fee and is willing to do so. He must
submit the filing and administrative fees of $400.00 to the Clerk of the Court, noting the above
case style number, within thirty days of the date of this order, along with a motion to reopen the
case. Upon receipt of the motion and full payment, this case will be reopened.
An in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action is
considered frivolous and not in good faith.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 2nd day of June, 2016.
/s/ Billy Roy Wilson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?