Daniels v. McCormack Baron Salzaar et al

Filing 40

JUDGMENT: Pursuant to 39 Order, plaintiff Byron K. Daniels' operative complaint is dismissed. The Court dismisses without prejudice Mr. Daniels' claims against separate defendants Baron Salazar, Inc., d/b/a The Oaks Apartment, and Catrici a Marks. The Court dismisses with prejudice Mr. Daniels' claims pursuant to Title VII and the ADEA, against separate defendants Pauline Olden and Mary Long in their individual capacities. The Court dismisses without prejudice Mr. Daniels' remaining claims against Ms. Olden and Ms. Long. The relief sought is denied. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 6/5/2018. (cmn)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
WESTERN DIVISION
BYRON K. DANIELS
v.

PLAINTIFF
Case No. 4:16-cv-00291 KGB

MCCORMACK BARON SALZAAR, et al.

DEFENDANTS

JUDGMENT
Pursuant to the Order entered on this date, it is considered, ordered, and adjudged that
plaintiff Byron K. Daniels’ operative complaint is dismissed. The Court dismisses without
prejudice Mr. Daniels’ claims against separate defendants Baron Salazar, Inc., d/b/a The Oaks
Apartment (“McCormack”), and Catricia Marks. The Court dismisses with prejudice Mr. Daniels’
claims pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, and
the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 623(d), against separate
defendants Pauline Olden and Mary Long in their individual capacities. The Court dismisses
without prejudice Mr. Daniels’ remaining claims against Ms. Olden and Ms. Long. The relief
sought is denied.
So adjudged this 5th day of June, 2018.
____________________________________
Kristine G. Baker
United States District Judge