Kimmel v. USA et al
Filing
16
ORDER ADOPTING 12 Partial Recommended Disposition: Plaintiff's claims against defendant Jordan Crews are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Kimmel's claims against defendants USA, Faulkner County, Arkansas, Andy Shock, Matt Rice, Hoffman, Teel , Head, Saxton, Bishop, Lingo, Stubbe, Blankenship, Foreman, Bryant, Lewis, Wimberly, Bohm, Brian Williams, and Does, are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Kimmell's 10 Motion to Dismiss Party is DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 10/21/2016. (mcz)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
LITTLE ROCK DIVISION
PATRICK KIMMEL
V.
PLAINTIFF
NO: 4:16CV00483 JM/PSH
USA et al
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition
submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris. No objections have been filed.
After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Partial
Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this
Court's findings in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
1.
Plaintiff Patrick Kimmel’s claims against defendant Jordan Crews are DISMISSED
WITH PREJUDICE.
2.
Kimmel’s claims against defendants USA, Faulkner County, Arkansas, Andy Shock,
Matt Rice, Hoffman, Teel, Head, Saxton, Bishop, Lingo, Stubbe, Blankenship, Foreman, Bryant,
Lewis, Wimberly, Bohm, Brian Williams, and Does, are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
3.
Kimmel’s motion to dismiss parties (Doc. No. 10) is DENIED AS MOOT.
DATED 21st day of October, 2016.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?