Kimmel v. USA et al
Filing
25
ORDER ADOPTING 23 Proposed Findings and Recommendations. Plaintiff's 2 Complaint is dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with Local Rule 5.5(c)(2), and failure to respond to the Court's order. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 12/20/2016. (mcz)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
LITTLE ROCK DIVISION
PATRICK KIMMEL
V.
PLAINTIFF
NO: 4:16CV00483 JM/PSH
USA et al
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted
by United States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris. No objections have been filed. After careful
consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition
should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all
respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
1.
Plaintiff Patrick Kimmel’s complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for
failure to comply with Local Rule 5.5(c)(2), and failure to respond to the Court’s order.
2.
The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and
judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith.
DATED this 20th day of December, 2016.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?