Grissom v. Hutchinson et al

Filing 6

ORDER adopting 4 the recommended disposition; dismissing 2 Plaintiff Wesley E. Grissom's complaint with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. This dismissal counts as a "strike" for purposes28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 8/25/2016. (kdr)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
WESTERN DIVISION
WESLEY E. GRISSOM
ADC #110265
V.

PLAINTIFF

NO: 4:16CV00559 BSM

ASA HUTCHINSON, et al.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

The recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Patricia
S. Harris and plaintiff’s objections thereto have been reviewed. After carefully considering
these documents and making a de novo review of the record, the recommended disposition
is hereby adopted in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
1. Plaintiff Wesley E. Grissom’s complaint is dismissed with prejudice for failure to
state a claim upon which relief may be granted.
2. This dismissal counts as a “strike” for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
3. The court certifies that in in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and
judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith.
IT IS DO ORDERED this 25th day of August 2016.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE