Murray v. Holladay et al

Filing 54

ORDER ADOPTING 52 Proposed Findings and Recommendations. Defendant Thompson's 44 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted, and this cause of action is dismissed without prejudice. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 2/21/2017. (mcz)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION JAMES H. MURRAY, ADC # 91715 v. PLAINTIFF 4:16CV00619-JM DOC HOLLADAY, Sheriff, Pulaski County; et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and Plaintiff’s Objections. After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. Defendant Thompson’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 44) is GRANTED and this cause of action is DISMISSED without prejudice. 2. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. DATED this 21st day of February, 2017. _______________________________________ JAMES M. MOODY, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?