Badger v. Kelly et al

Filing 8

ORDER directing the Clerk of Court to prepare summonses for Defendants Kelly, Cashion, Shippman, Foote, Bassett, Meadows, Lumbnax, Jackson, Taylor, and Brooks through the Arkansas Department of Correction Compliance Division; directing the U.S. Mars hal to serve copies of the 2 Complaint with any attachments and a summons for the Defendants without prepayment of fees, costs, or security; and directing the Clerk of the Court to dismiss Defendants Mullins, Middleton, Benson, and McGruely. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 10/26/2016. (mef)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION CRAYTONIA BADGER, ADC #162710 V. PLAINTIFF CASE NO. 4:16-CV-00621 KGB/BD WENDY KELLY, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER Plaintiff Craytonia Badger filed this civil rights lawsuit without the help of a lawyer. (Docket entry #2) For screening purposes, he has stated constitutional claims against Defendants Kelly, Cashion, Shippman, Foote, Bassett, Meadows, Lumbnax, Jackson, Taylor, and Brooks.1 Accordingly, service is proper. The Clerk of Court is directed to prepare summonses for Defendants Kelly, Cashion, Shippman, Foote, Bassett, Meadows, Lumbnax, Jackson, Taylor, and Brooks. The United States Marshal is directed to serve copies of the Complaint, with any attachments (#2), and a summons for the Defendants without requiring prepayment of fees and costs or security. Service for the Defendants should be through the Arkansas Department of Correction Compliance Division, P.O. Box 20550, Pine Bluff, Arkansas 71612. 1 Mr. Badger voluntarily dismissed Defendants Mullins, Middleton, and Benson in his amended complaint. (#7) Likewise, he voluntarily dismissed his claim against Defendant McGruely. (#7) Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is directed to dismiss Defendants Mullins, Middleton, Benson and McGruely. IT IS SO ORDERED this 26th day of October, 2016. ___________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?