Whitley v. Baptist Health et al

Filing 112

ORDER: Whitley is not entitled to have the accounts' work audited, or otherwise root around in their work as consulting experts. Whitley's requested discovery about provider agreements connected with that Medicaid-related program (Arkansas 's private option) is too far afield. The Court approves counsel's recent agreement about providing patient contact information for class members - if the Court certifies a class. 111 Joint report addressed. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 4/30/2019. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION BRIAN WHITLEY, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated PLAINTIFF No. 4:16-cv-624-DPM v. BAPTIST HEALTH; BAPTIST HEALTH HOSPITALS; DIAMOND RISK INSURANCE LLC; CONTINENT AL CASUALTY COMPANY; ADMIRAL INSURANCE COMPANY; ADMIRAL INDEMNITY COMP ANY; IRONSHORE INDEMNITY, INC.; and IRONSHORE SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court appreciates the parties' concise joint report of discovery disputes. First, BKD works, and has worked, for the Barber firm on this case. Whitley is therefore not entitled to have the accountants' work audited/ or otherwise root around in their work as consulting experts. Second, this case is not about folks who participate in Arkansas's private option. Whitley's requested discovery about provider agreements connected with that Medicaid-related program is too far afield. Last, the Court approves counsel's recent agreement about providing patient contact information for class members - if the Court certifies a class. Joint report, NQ 111, addressed. So Ordered. I' D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge 3o -2- lfrd ;.019

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?