Lane v. Huffman
ORDER adopting in their entirety 5 proposed findings and recommendations and dismissing Plaintiff's Complaint against Defendant for failure to state a claim. Dismissal of this action constitutes a "strike" within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and the Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and Judgment would not be taken in good faith pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 9/29/2016. (mef)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
THOMAS D. LANE,
The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States
Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. There have been no objections. After a review of those
proposed findings and recommendations, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly,
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:
Plaintiff’s Complaint against Defendant is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim.
Dismissal of this action constitutes a “strike” within the meaning of the Prison
Litigation Reform Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and
accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).
An appropriate Judgment shall accompany this Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 29th day of September, 2016.
/s/Susan Webber Wright
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?