Mills v. Murphy et al

Filing 11

ORDER adopting 10 the recommended disposition; dismissing without prejudice plaintiff Michael Mills's claims for failure to supplement 1 his complaint with missing facts as ordered 9 . Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 1/27/2017. (kdr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION MICHAEL MILLS ADC #656842 v. PLAINTIFF CASE NO. 4:16CV00680 BSM KEVIN MURPHY, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The recommended disposition (“RD”) submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Beth Deere [Doc. No. 10] has been reviewed. No objections have been filed. After reviewing the record, the RD is adopted. Accordingly, plaintiff Michael Mills’s claims are dismissed without prejudice for failure to failure to supplement his complaint with missing facts as ordered [Doc. No. 9]. See Local Rule 5.5. IT IS SO ORDERED this 27th day of January 2017. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?