Moles v. Shourd et al
ORDER approving and adopting the 181 Recommendations; granting 146 , 159 Defendants' motions for summary judgment; dismissing with prejudice Moles's inadequate medical care claims against Shourd, Grimes, McCullom, and Bentley; dismissing this case with prejudice; denying as moot 182 Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Response; and denying 185 Motion for Sanctions. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 7/20/2017. (mef)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
WALTER CURTIS MOLES, ADC #119166
Sheriff of White County, et al.
I have reviewed the Recommendation (Doc. No. 181) submitted by United States
Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray and the filed objections. After carefully considering these
documents and making a de novo review of the record in this case, I approve and adopt the
Recommendation as set out below:
Defendants’ motions for summary judgment (Doc. No. 146, 159) are GRANTED.
Moles’s inadequate medical care claims against Shourd, Grimes, McCullom, Cox, and Bentley
are dismissed with prejudice. Because there are no remaining Defendants, this case is
DISMISSED with prejudice.
Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend Response (Doc. No. 182) is DENIED as MOOT and the
Motion for Sanctions (Doc. No. 185) is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 20th day of July, 2017.
/s/ Billy Roy Wilson________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?