Moles v. Shourd et al

Filing 187

ORDER approving and adopting the 181 Recommendations; granting 146 , 159 Defendants' motions for summary judgment; dismissing with prejudice Moles's inadequate medical care claims against Shourd, Grimes, McCullom, and Bentley; dismissing this case with prejudice; denying as moot 182 Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Response; and denying 185 Motion for Sanctions. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 7/20/2017. (mef)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION WALTER CURTIS MOLES, ADC #119166 VS. PLAINTIFF 4:16-CV-00710-BRW-JTR RICKY SHOURD, Sheriff of White County, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER I have reviewed the Recommendation (Doc. No. 181) submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray and the filed objections. After carefully considering these documents and making a de novo review of the record in this case, I approve and adopt the Recommendation as set out below: Defendants’ motions for summary judgment (Doc. No. 146, 159) are GRANTED. Moles’s inadequate medical care claims against Shourd, Grimes, McCullom, Cox, and Bentley are dismissed with prejudice. Because there are no remaining Defendants, this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend Response (Doc. No. 182) is DENIED as MOOT and the Motion for Sanctions (Doc. No. 185) is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED this 20th day of July, 2017. /s/ Billy Roy Wilson________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?