Drew v. Blanks-Mullins et al

Filing 27

ORDER approving and adopting 25 Recommended Disposition as this Court's findings in all respects; denying as moot 22 Defendants' motion for summary judgment; and certifying pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 6/27/2017. (mef)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
LITTLE ROCK DIVISION
MARK ANTHONY DREW,
ADC #656225
v.

PLAINTIFF

Case No. 4:16-cv-00735 KGB/JTR

BLANKS-MULLINS,
Health Services Administrator,
Correct Care Solutions, Inc., et al.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

The Court has received and reviewed the Recommended Disposition submitted by United
States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray (Dkt. No. 25). The parties have not filed objections. After
careful review of the Recommended Disposition, the Court concludes that the Recommended
Disposition should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted as this Court’s findings in all respects.
This action is dismissed without prejudice. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is denied
as moot (Dkt. No. 22). It is certified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis
appeal would not be taken in good faith.
So ordered this this the 27th day of June, 2017.
____________________________
Kristine G. Baker
United States District Judge