Drew v. Blanks-Mullins et al

Filing 27

ORDER approving and adopting 25 Recommended Disposition as this Court's findings in all respects; denying as moot 22 Defendants' motion for summary judgment; and certifying pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 6/27/2017. (mef)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS LITTLE ROCK DIVISION MARK ANTHONY DREW, ADC #656225 v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 4:16-cv-00735 KGB/JTR BLANKS-MULLINS, Health Services Administrator, Correct Care Solutions, Inc., et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has received and reviewed the Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray (Dkt. No. 25). The parties have not filed objections. After careful review of the Recommended Disposition, the Court concludes that the Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted as this Court’s findings in all respects. This action is dismissed without prejudice. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is denied as moot (Dkt. No. 22). It is certified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. So ordered this this the 27th day of June, 2017. ____________________________ Kristine G. Baker United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?