Drew v. Blanks-Mullins et al

Filing 7

ORDER adopting 5 the Recommended Partial Disposition as this Court's findings in all respects. Mr. Drew's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 harassment, Federal Tort Claims Act, and Arkansas tort of outrage claims against separate defendants Blanks-M ullins and M. Jones are dismissed without prejudice for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. It is certified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 12/2/2016. (kdr)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
LITTLE ROCK DIVISION
MARK ANTHONY DREW,
ADC #656225
v.

PLAINTIFF

Case No. 4:16-cv-00735 KGB/JTR

BLANKS-MULLINS,
Health Services Administrator,
Correct Care Solutions, Inc., et al.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

The Court has received and reviewed the Recommended Partial Disposition submitted by
United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray (Dkt. No. 5). Plaintiff Mark Anthony Drew filed
objections (Dkt. No. 6). After careful consideration of the Recommended Partial Disposition and
Mr. Drew’s timely objections, and a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the
Recommended Partial Disposition should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted as this
Court’s findings in all respects (Dkt. No. 5).
Therefore, Mr. Drew's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 harassment, Federal Tort Claims Act, and
Arkansas tort of outrage claims against separate defendants Blanks-Mullins and M. Jones are
dismissed without prejudice for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. It is
certified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order
would not be taken in good faith.
So ordered this this the 2nd day of December, 2016.
____________________________
Kristine G. Baker
United States District Judge