Hamilton v. Stodola et al
ORDER granting in part and denying in part without prejudice 45 City Defendants' motion for summary judgment; granting in part and denying in part without prejudice 49 , 53 Ditech's and Clean Sweep's motions for summary judgment; denying without prejudice as moot 87 motion to strike Ditech's reply; denying 93 motion to strike Clean Sweep's reply; dismissing with prejudice all claims brought under the U.S. Constitution; declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over all the remaining claims; and remanding what remains of this removed case to the Circuit Court of Pulaski County, Arkansas. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 2/16/2018. (mef)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
MARK STODOLA, in his official capacity as
Mayor of the City of Little Rock, Arkansas; CITY
OF LITTLE ROCK; BRITTANY GODFREY;
MITCHEL JACKSON; DITECH FINANCIAL LLC;
GREEN TREE SERVICING LLC; KAMAL ELLIS;
and CLEAN SWEEP MANAGEMENT LLC
For the reasons stated on the record at the end of the hearing
today, the Court made the following rulings on the pending motions:
• The City Defendants' motion for summary judgment, NQ 45,
is partly granted and partly denied without prejudice;
• Ditech's and Clean Sweep's motions, NQ 49 & NQ 53, are
partly granted and partly denied without prejudice;
• The motion to strike Ditech's reply, NQ 87, is denied without
prejudice as moot; and
• The motion to strike Clean Sweep' s reply, NQ 93, is denied.
All claims brought under the U.S. Constitution are
dismissed with prejudice. The Court declines to exercise supplemental
jurisdiction over all the remaining claims, which raise only matters of
Arkansas law. 28U.S.C.§1367(c)(3).
The Court exercises its discretion and, rather than
dismissing without prejudice, remands what remains of this removed
case to the Circuit Court of Pulaski County, Arkansas. Carnegie-Mellon
University v. Cohill, 484 U.S. 343 (1988).
D .P. Marshall Jr.
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?