Hamilton v. Stodola et al
ORDER denying 105 Motion. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 4/11/2018. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
MARK STODOLA, in his official capacity as
Mayor of the City of Little Rock, Arkansas; CITY
OF LITTLE ROCK; BRITTANY GODFREY;
MITCHEL JACKSON; DITECH FINANCIAL LLC;
GREEN TREE SERVICING LLC; KAMAL ELLIS;
and CLEAN SWEEP MANAGEMENT LLC
Hamilton asks the Court, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure 52(b), 59(e), and 60(b)(6), to amend its February 2018 Order,
which dismissed Hamilton's federal constitutional claims and
remanded his state law claims to the Circuit Court of Pulaski County,
Arkansas. Hamilton wants the Court to revisit the federal law issues.
Assuming the Court can reach the merits of Hamilton's motion
under one of the cited Rules, the motion fails. Hamilton's core point is
that the Court made a mistake on the federal claims. This is mostly a
continuation of the many arguments Hamilton made in his extensive
briefing on the various motions and his thorough oral argument at the
hearing on those motions. The Court is still not persuaded. It stands
by its bench ruling as a whole, including the precedent cited and the
reasons given. NQ 103 at 54-65.
Hamilton's motion, NQ 105, is denied.
D.P. Marshall Jr.
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?