Hamilton v. Stodola et al

Filing 21

ORDER denying 11 Motion to Remand; denying 12 Motion to Strike. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 12/13/2016. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LARRY HAMILTON v. PLAINTIFF No. 4:16-cv-756-DPM MARK STODOLA, In his official capacity as Mayor of the City of Little Rock, Arkansas; CITY OF LITTLE ROCK; BRITTANY GODFREY; MITCHEL JACKSON; DITECH FINANCIAL LLC; GREEN TREE SERVICING LLC; KAMAL ELLIS; and CLEAN SWEEP MANAGEMENT LLC DEFENDANTS ORDER Hamilton's motions to remand and to strike the notice of removal, Ng 11 & 12, are denied. Di tech' s notice said all then-served defendants joined. Ng 1 at 4. All defendants have opposed remand and confirmed consent-in writing. NQ 16 & 17. This suffices under 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446. Griffioen v. Cedar Rapids and Iowa City Railway Company, 785 F.3d 1182, 1188 (8th Cir. 2015). And Ditech's lawyer appeared by signing and filing the notice; no pnor separate paper was required. So Ordered. D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?